Analysis of Occupational Safety in Terms of Interpersonal Communication and Basic Safety Training With Organizational Policy as an Intervening Variable on Training Ship Mohammad Husni (M.H) Thamrin

  • Catur Ratmoko Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran
  • Marihot Simanjuntak Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta
  • Susi Herawati Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta
  • Ayudhia Pangestu Gusti Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pelayaran Jakarta
Keywords: Interpersonal Communication, Basic Safety Training, Organizational Policy, Workplace Safety

Abstract

This research purpose to describe the impact of organizational policies on workplace safety aboard the Training Ship Mohammad Husni (M.H) Thamrin through basic safety and interpersonal communication training at the Maritime College in 2023. The research method employed is quantitative. Data were collected through questionnaires distributed directly to respondents as primary data, along with secondary data. Data analysis was conducted using SmartPLS version 3 for Windows. The research results indicate that the R Square (R2) values show the R2 for Organizational Policy (Y) is at 0.686, and the R2 for Work Safety (Z) is at 0.665, indicating a moderate level of effect. This suggests that the influence of interpersonal communication and basic safety training on organizational policy and workplace safety factors is 67.55%, while the influence from other variables is approximately 32.45%. The interpretation of the F Square values has three criteria categories: a value of 0.02 indicates a small effect, 0.15 indicates a moderate effect, and 0.35 indicates a large effect at the structural level. The influence of (X1) on (Y) is 0.106 (Moderate), (X2) on (Y) is 0.127 (Moderate), (X1) on (Z) is 0.561 (Strong), (X2) on (Z) is 0.504 (Strong), and (Y) on (Z) is 0.030, all of which fall into the weak category. Thus, it can be concluded that basic safety training has a more significant impact on company commitment than interpersonal communication. Additionally, organizational policies also have a direct and significant influence on workplace safety.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Astivia, O. L. O., & Zumbo, B. D. (2019). Heteroskedasticity in multiple regression analysis: What it is, how to detect it and how to solve it with applications in R and SPSS. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 24(1), 1–16.
Borkowski, N., & Meese, K. A. (2020). Organizational behavior in health care. Jones & Bartlett Learning., 2020.
Browne, T., Taylor, R., Veitch, B., Kujala, P., Khan, F., & Smith, D. (2020). A framework for integrating life-safety and environmental consequences into conventional arctic shipping risk models. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 10(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/APP10082937
Chauhan, R. E. a. (2019). Building Performance Service Through Transformational Leadership Analysis, Work Stress And Work Motivation (Empirical Case Study In Stationery Distributor Companies). Dijemss, 1(1), 87–107. https://dinastirpub.org/DIJEMSS
Costa, A. C., Fulmer, C. A., & Anderson, N. R. (2018). Trust in work teams: An integrative review, multilevel model, and future directions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(2), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2213
DEPHUB KNKT. (2022). Komite Nasional Keselamatan Transportasi (KNKT): Laporan Statistik Investigasi Kecelakaan Transportasi Pelayaran. DEPHUB. http://knkt.dephub.go.id/knkt/ntsc_maritime/maritime_investigation_report1.htm
Exarchopoulos, G., Zhang, P., Pryce-Roberts, N., & Zhao, M. (2018). Seafarers’ welfare: A critical review of the related legal issues under the Maritime Labour Convention 2006. Marine Policy, 93(December 2017), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.04.005
Herno Della, R., Lirn, T. C., & Shang, K. C. (2020). The study of safety behavior in ferry transport. Safety Science, 131(May), 104912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104912
Karakasnaki, M., Vlachopoulos, P., Pantouvakis, A., & Bouranta, N. (2018). ISM Code implementation: an investigation of safety issues in the shipping industry. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 17(3), 461–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-018-0153-4
Mbong, T. S. S., & Bygvraa, D. A. (2021). Analysis of the implementation of the International Safety Management Code using motivation theory: the seafarer’s views. International Maritime Health, 72(3), 172–178. https://doi.org/10.5603/IMH.2021.0033
Österman, C., Hult, C., & Praetorius, G. (2020). Occupational safety and health for service crew on passenger ships. Safety Science, 121(November 2018), 403–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.09.024
Pagau, J., & Anugrah, P. P. (2021). Analisa Pengaruh Human Error Terhadap Kecelakaa Kerja Di PT. Industri Kapal Indonesia Dengan Menggunakan Pendekatan Cross Sectional Method. Zona Laut : Jurnal Inovasi Sains Dan Teknologi Kelautan, 2(2), 40–46. https://doi.org/10.20956/zl.v2i2.14369
Puisa, R., McNay, J., & Montewka, J. (2021). Maritime safety: Prevention versus mitigation? Safety Science, 136(December 2020), 105151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105151
Radic, A., Arjona-Fuentes, J. M., Ariza-Montes, A., Han, H., & Law, R. (2020). Job demands–job resources (JD-R) model, work engagement, and well-being of cruise ship employees. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 88(March), 102518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102518
Ramayah, T., Cheah, J., Chuah, F., Ting, H., & Memon, M. A. (2012). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) using SmartPLS 3.0: An Updated Guide and Practical Guide to Statistical Analysis.
Sampson, H., Ellis, N., & International, S. (n.d.). Seafarers ’ mental health and wellbeing.
Published
2024-05-31
How to Cite
Ratmoko, C., Simanjuntak, M., Herawati, S., & Gusti, A. P. (2024). Analysis of Occupational Safety in Terms of Interpersonal Communication and Basic Safety Training With Organizational Policy as an Intervening Variable on Training Ship Mohammad Husni (M.H) Thamrin. Dinamika Bahari, 5(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.46484/db.v5i1.574